Country still to be considered.

Value based on 25-50 cases.

Census.

Survey.

Years of survey: 1998-1999.

Data refer to 2003-2004.

Committed debt relief under the assumption of full participation of creditors.

Country that has reached pre-decision point.

Data Not Reported and Party has no Obligation under the Montreal Protocol to Report data for that year at the time of publication of the data.

Data refer to 1998-1999.

LAM is included as a traditional method.

Based on small denominators (typically 25-49 unweighted cases).

Source: Cote D'Ivoire Aids Indicator Survey 2005.

Source: Cote D'Ivoire Multiple Indicator Survey 2000 (re-analyzed at Unicef).

Source: Cote D'Ivoire Multiple Indicator Survey 2006, Final Report (p. 114, Table HA.2).

Source: Cote D'Ivoire Aids Indicator Survey 2005 (table 7.4).

Source: MICS 2000.

Source: MICS 2006.

Source: AIS 2005.

Source: Enquête Nutrition et Mortalité 2003-04.

Source: DHS 1994, 1998/99.

Age group is 0-35 mos.

Age group is 0-59 mos.

Figure for this year is reported for a different age group as other figures in the time series. Therefore it may not be comparable.

Source: DHS 1994, Final Report, Table 8.4, p. 134.

Source: DHS 1998-99, Final Report, Table 8.5, p. 126.

Source: Enquête Nutritionnelle Nationale 2004, Table 8, p. 36.

Source: MICS 2006, Re-analyzed by UNICEF HQ, April 2007.

Source: DHS 1994, Final report, p. 134.

Source: DHS 1998-1999, p. 126.

Data refers to 1988-1992.

Data refers to 1993-1997.

Data refers to 1998-2002.

Classified under the group of countries with no appropriate maternal mortality data for the period 1995–2005.

Source: AIS 2005, Final report.

Source: DHS 1994, Final report, p. 109.

Source: DHS 1998-1999, Final report, p. 104.

Source: Enquête Nutrition et Mortalite en Cote d'Ivoire, 2004, p. 22 and Table 6, p. 34.

Source: MICS 2000, Reanalyzed by UNICEF HQ, June 2003.

Source: MICS 2006, Reanalyzed by UNICEF HQ, April 2007.

Source: AIS 2005, Final report, Table 4.10, p. 55.

Source: DHS 1994, Final report, p. 104.

Source: DHS 1998-1999, Final report, p. 100.

Source: MICS II - standard tables rerun by NYHQ (revised Oct 2002/DPP, June 03).

Country that has reached decision point under the enhanced HIPC Initiative. The HIPC decision point is the date at which a heavily indebted poor country with an established track record of good performance under adjustment programs supported by the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank commits to undertake additional reforms and to develop and implement a poverty reduction strategy.

ITU estimate.

Area km2 (Value) is the area designated in that year as listed in the World Database on Protected Areas and may be generated from spatial (GIS) boundary data as outlined in series Metadata sheet in Treatment of Missing Values.

Source: BMI.

Expenditure base.

Estimated from Enquête niveau de vie des ménages (ENV); 2002; National coverage.

Estimated from Enquête Prioritaire; 1993; National coverage.

Estimated from Enquête prioritaire; 1998; National coverage.

Estimated from Enquête sur le Niveau de Vie; 1995; National coverage.

Refers to expenditure share by percentiles of population, ranked by per capita expenditure.

Debt service payments are adjusted to reflect debt relief under HIPC initiative.

Also reached decision point under the original HIPC Initiative. The assistance includes original debt relief, committed in net NPV terms as of the decision point and are converted to end-2007 terms.

Status as of March 2009.

Total HIPC assistance in end-2007 net present value (NPV) terms.

Country reached decision point in March 2009.

Source: Population Census.

Users will note differences in the emissions data reported in our latest update for this country compared to data reported previously. These differences reflect improvements in the treatment of data on liquid fuels used for non-energy purposes by CDIAC and also reflect increased richness of the underlying United Nations energy statistics database. In past years, CDIAC relied on United Nations production estimates for their treatment of seven liquid fuels used primarily for non-energy purposes and assumed these select fuels were used only for non-energy purposes. These seven fuels include bitumen (asphalt), lubricants, naphtha, petroleum coke, petroleum waxes, white spirits and "other petroleum products". As the richness of consumption data for these liquid commodities in the United Nations energy database has improved, it has become apparent these fuels are also used in some countries for energy purposes (e.g., within plants and refineries). Beginning with this latest release, CDIAC now uses United Nations consumption and trade data for these seven commodities to determine the amounts used for non-energy purposes and to quantify combustion for energy applications. Questions regarding changes in the CDIAC methodology may be sent to Tom Boden (bodenta@ornl.gov).

Source:DHS

Source:MICS

Survey 1989-1994 DHS

Survey 1994-1999 DHS

Survey 2001-2005 DHS

Survey 2005-2006 MICS

1990-1992

1995-1997

2003-2005

Includes areas for which year (Date of Establishment/designation) is unavailable

Sites are nationally designated. Designated is defined as the authority correspond to national legislation or common practice (e.g. by means of an executive decrees or the alike) officially endorses a document of designation

In estimating solid fuel use for a given year, the methods developed and implemented by the WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation (WHO & UNICEF 2006 ) were followed. Solid fuel information is either extrapolated (single year data point), averaged (two or more years that are spaced four or fewer years apart) or a linear regression is performed when solid fuel use information is available for two or more years that are spaced at least five years apart.